Betting on black ...

A member of the Crooks family was recently talking about roulette, specifically how he thought that there must be a strategy that can put the odds of winning in your favor. Perhaps there is, but he wasn’t able to vocalize it and we weren’t buying it. Flipping a coin came to mind.

Then we came across a book where the author thought he figured out such a strategy that would guarantee he made money – bet on black. Bet on black ... every time. And if you lose just bet more money than you’ve lost on your next bet ... on black. He tried putting this theory to work. Nine minutes, five bets, and $1200 worth of cash and cash advances later he had lost more than double what he makes in a week and has yet to prove his strategy effective.

alt

The famous “Hodgepodge” ...

After yesterday’s risk-taking rocket ride the obvious reaction is to sit and watch for a reaction. Will traders take the opportunity to sell after yesterday’s strength? And if so is it profit-taking or simply an opportunity to get short?

Or is yesterday’s strength a sign that traders and investors are done pricing in double-dip recession potential?

alt

Risk on: China leading PMI could be good thing for growth…

We’ve been strident about the idea that global growth decoupling from the US is a myth. The idea being the US consumer is still the primary demand engine for the world, and Mr. US Consumer becomes all the more important as European demand heads into its austerity shell. But today’s news has us wondering a bit about our stridency.

China’s PMI rebounding above the 50-level this month, surprising some analysts, which includes us. We’d like to chalk it up to “official” Chinese numbers and such, but China growth seems to be validated by the stronger than expected growth reported by Australia this morning, which follows on the heels of weaker than expected growth in Canada. Hmmm … Australia is closer to China and Canada closer to the US; that may have something to do with it.

alt

How you know it is getting ugly out there: Paul Krugman.

“President Barack Obama, under pressure to bolster the U.S. economy, said on Monday he and his economic advisers are discussing additional steps to generate job growth such as more tax cuts for businesses.” (Reuters)

Officially, Paul Krugman is not one of Obama’s aforementioned economic advisers, but technically there may be a difference.

Paul Krugman, Keynesian worshiper through and through, is always arguing for government intervention and/or defending the current administration’s policies. That alone is frustrating enough. But reading his typically short-sighted economic “thought pieces” so graciously published in The New York Times can make your head hurt.

alt

To QE2 or Not to QE2, That is the Question ...

Dong, dong, dong….as the hour of Big Ben’s speech this morning from Jackson Hole approaches, bets are being lined up as whether Mr. Bernanke will indeed rev up his helicopter for yet another strategic drop…

Action: Mr. Bernanke says yes, the Fed will embark on quantitative easing #2 (QE2).

alt